Tampilkan postingan dengan label Facebook. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Facebook. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 15 Agustus 2011

Corporate Tax Dodgers Rankling The U.S. Government

The CBS News program "60 Minutes" aired a segment yesterday, exposing American companies that have relocated their headquarters, sometimes only on paper, to European nations, to avoid paying the 35% income tax rate in the United States. Many of their CEOs and upper level management still live in the States.

Google, Facebook, Pfizer, GE, Cisco are among the American corporations that have relocated to countries such as Ireland and Switzerland, to avoid full domestic taxes, while maintaining offices of various sizes in the United States. It is estimated, America has lost 100,000 jobs and $1 trillion dollars, due to this practice.

The United States GDP is currently $14.5 trillion dollars. Regrettably, so is the national debt, thanks to the latest hike in the debt ceiling, which created an S&P downgrade of America. The U.S. government does collect trillions in taxes, but as stated numerous times on the Judiciary Report, some of the funds are going to fruitless, wasteful programs and initiatives.

Many countries would love to have a GDP as high as $14.5 trillion, yet the government, for reasons known to them, can't make it work, as written about in the article "Is $14.5 Trillion Not Enough Money." How can they not make that work, when that's so much money coming in (regarding their cut of corporate revenues).

The Judiciary Report finds it very alarming that the government can't make a success on their end out of such a successful GDP. Something is wrong there (government management). Serious questions need to be asked, because with all the money coming into the national treasury, America should never have reached the point of landing in an unprecedented financial crisis (2008 to the present) that has rivaled and surpassed the Great Depression in some respects. The system is broken and needs to be fixed.

Rabu, 13 Juli 2011

Plastic Surgeons Call Megan Fox A Liar Over Botox Claims


Megan Fox

According to a Zimbo article, Megan Fox has done herself a disservice in claiming she's had no Botox injected into her face, to reduce wrinkles and give a smoother appearance. Doctors have gone on records disputing her claims.

The article stated, "Dr. Nicholas Vendemia of New York said, "'Those lines on her forehead are totally fake.' Dr. Vince Afashi of Newport Beach insisted, 'The photo looks altered. The muscles in the forehead do not usually create an arc-like pattern seen in the photo,' adding, 'Anatomically [it] does not make sense.' Finally, Dr. David Sire of Fullerton thinks if the photos are untouched, then the forehead isn't: 'I have never seen the frontalis muscle do this unless the muscle was surgically cut. It appears as if she is frowning and elevating her brow at the same time. Quite a feat!'"

It's a shame she altered her face beyond the nose job, as the rest of the work, such as cheek and lip alterations, have made beautiful Fox look a bit plastic. Fame messes with people's heads, in an industry where the more work you have done, the better you allegedly look, which is not true.

Fox looked her best in 2009, before she engaged in excessive cosmetic procedures that have added years to her face. Take a look at the comparative photos below, as should Megan and leave the cosmetic work alone for years:

Fox in 2009 (left) and 2011 (right)

Fox in 2009 (left) and 2011 (right)

Fox in 2009 (left) and 2010 (right)

Fox in 2009 (left) and 2010 (right)

STORY SOURCE

Megan Fox's 'Botox' Photos May Have Backfired

RELATED ARTICLES

Megan Fox Lying About Not Having Work Done

Megan Fox Overdid It With The Plastic Surgery

Megan Fox's Plastic Surgery - Part 2

Megan Fox's Plastic Surgery

Megan Fox Had Sex With Shia LaBeouf

Transformers 3 Sales Decline Actually Higher Than Reported

Transformers 3 Sales Decline 24% From Its Predecessor

Shia LaBeouf Slammed For Blabbing About Having Sex With Megan Fox

Public Feedback On Megan Fox's Absence From Transformers 3

Rosie Huntington Whiteley Is Receiving Bad Reviews For Transformers

Kamis, 30 Juni 2011

MySpace Bought For $600,000,000 Sold For $35,000,000


Rupert Murdoch: boy I've lost a boatload

In an act that screams business fail on the part of News Corp, the once popular social networking website, My Space, was purchased by the aforementioned company's founder, Rupert Murdoch, for $600,000,000 and now sold a few years later in a fire sale for $35,000,000.

Has MySpace become a place for no one

This occurred due to the emergence of social networking websites Twitter and Facebook. The public shifted its attention from My Space and down went its value. It is being stated, not even My Space's founders use the site anymore. It's very competitive out there in said realm of internet sites.

Kamis, 16 Juni 2011

The Facebook Flush

Align Center

Mark Zuckerberg

Reports indicate, Facebook has lost over 8,000,000 users worldwide - 6,000,000 of them in America. Could it be due to the film "The Social Network" and the negative reviews that followed. The Judiciary Report's sister site, the Celluloid Film Review, did an in-depth review on the film, slamming the misconduct Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg, engaged in as seen in the movie. It would have been so much better had Zuckerberg not cut the Winklevoss twins out of their own creation he stole and ran with, claiming it as his own, when emails between the parties reveal otherwise.

STORY SOURCE

Report: Facebook loses 6M users in US

Kamis, 19 Mei 2011

Obama's Relationship With Google Under Fire Over Blocking Free Speech And Free Press

Barack Obama

Watchdog groups are calling for an investigation into the relationship between President Barack Obama and the internet search engine company Google and said claims are legitimate. Email evidence was uncovered regarding the relationship. A number of websites and bloggers have publicly complained, their websites have been removed from Google search engine results, for authoring and publishing articles critical of President Obama, in spite of the fact the First Amendment of the Constitution, guarantees free speech and free press, without fear of retribution.

The fact of the matter is, President Obama, can be quite vindictive, vengeful and petty, which is the mark of a small man. Mainstream newspaper the Boston Herald, is further proof of this fact, as they were punished and penalized by the White House, for allowing other presidential candidates column inches and daring to seek answers from President Obama on the difficult and relevant questions concerning the country. The Boston Herald wrote of the President's inappropriate blacklisting:

"Obama swimming in shallow end of pool. Was it something I said, Barry? Or should I say, Hussein? So the Herald can’t be in the White House pool because we’re not in the White House tank? Nixon would be proud. Imagine if George Bush had tried to set up his own personal 'Enemies List.' Where’s the ACLU when one of the Beautiful People unleashes his own Plumbers on the loyal opposition?...

All we asked was to be in the press pool. But nooooo. Because the Obama worshipers object to the front-page placement of an op-ed piece by Mitt Romney...In case you missed it, the White House yesterday banned the Herald from the 'pool' reporting list to cover the Messiah’s latest trip to Boston. Obama’s press office had to protect the Boston Globe, which once prided itself on being at odds with the Powers That Be. If the Globe’s current reporters were dogs, they would be described with one of two words. 'Spayed' or 'neutered.' And I just thought of a third word — 'lapdogs.'"

President Barack Obama and Michelle Obama

In another revealing incident, the White House contacted a newspaper and demanded an item critical of First Lady Michelle Obama be removed. According to the Daily Caller, "A local California paper in Pleasanton, California was contacted in April by the White House and asked to remove a passage that presented an unflattering description of the first lady. The paper complied, then tipped off The Daily Caller."

It is very alarming that the President and his wife are this trivial and superficial. Instead of tending to massive unemployment and the skyrocketing deficit, President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama, are obsessing over their unflattering press clippings, attempting to rewrite history and cherry pick what the entire press writes about them in a free country.

Sadly, Obama has lost his way and the plot - and the public knows it. President Obama is showing himself to be a fraud, not upholding the Constitution or U.S. Code, which bars administrations from interfering in the press. To unlawfully impede the publishing of articles, is to erode and potentially destroy the income of writers.

Who are you to be leaning on and harassing people for lawfully speaking their minds and voicing their opinions in print. You're supposed to be creating jobs as President, not trying to destroy them and people's livelihoods in the process. No wonder unemployment is so high - Obama simply does not care and is preoccupied with other egotistical things.

I for one can attest, there is an un-kosher relationship between Obama and Google, as I received an email from said company this week, regarding my articles in Google News (which were removed - yes, they are still trying to destroy my income). I can attest, President Obama and co., dislike the concept of free press and they are well out of order over this conduct.

It should be noted, seeking to remove articles from search engines is futile in suppressing free speech, as many websites receive massive traffic from referrals - regular readers forwarding article links to others, by email, IM, message boards and feedback sections.

This is commonly known as word of mouth and there is no way for Google or any other search engine to remove that. There are bloggers and writers, who are not listed in Google News or Google Blogs, yet their websites have millions of regular readers, who log-on often to read the latest updates.

Drudge Report and other prominent bloggers are proof of this fact. This week it was reported, Drudge refers more news traffic to other websites, than Facebook, a site of 500,000,0000 users, whose CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, Obama recently schmoozed for favorable coverage.

However, Drudge accomplished this feat without being listed in Google News or Google Blogs. Guess Obama kissed up to the wrong people. It's always funny when a politician kisses up to the wrong individuals, because at the end of the day, they should not be schmoozing anyone, as it lowers their office.

Furthermore, such juvenile, petty, vindictive and corrupt conduct, in suppressing free speech, has no place in an administration or a free democracy. It is un-American and un-Western. When you as a head of state, pull strings in seeking to suppress the press, you lose credibility and all moral ground as a politician in the world. Politicians that engage in such conduct are labeled by the voting public, hypocrites not fit to lead.

One cannot privately punish the press for seeking and speaking the truth, then publicly stand up and condemn other world governments, such as those representing China, Russia, Venezuela, Iran, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Libya, proclaiming they should have a free and democratic society, when you are behaving in a manner contrary to those proclamations. You must first practice what you preach, then you can lecture others on the virtues of democracy and a free society.

STORY SOURCE

White House Emails Show More Extensive Improper Contact With Google

Group Urges Investigation of Google-Obama Ties

Watchdog wants probe of Google's 'unusually close' ties to Obama ...

White House alleged to have punished unfavorable press, again

Obama swimming in shallow end of pool

FTC Drops Investigation of Google Less Than a Week After Company Exec Hosts Obama Fundraiser

The Drudge Report Drives More Top News Traffic than Twitter or Facebook, Study

Study: Drudge Report drives more news traffic than Twitter, Facebook

Jumat, 13 Mei 2011

Angry Selena Gomez Says She Is Not Going To Marry Justin Bieber


Justin Bieber

Actress Selena Gomez, recently stated, she is not going to marry singer Justin Bieber, who she has been dating for a year. Gomez continues to resentfully express her anger at Bieber’s fans, regarding statements written about her on social networking sites, such as Twitter and Facebook. The real kicker came this month, when Gomez told Teen Vogue magazine she is "not going to marry" Justin. Do you hear that noise. That's the sound of Bieber's audience rejoicing.

Selena Gomez

Gomez also stated in a interview with Look magazine about Bieber's fans, "I can't lie, it hurt, but I try to remember I have amazing fans and the people who are being nasty are in the minority. I have to wonder, would they say those things to my face or if they saw me in the street? People hide behind the internet because it's a barrier. I need someone who likes to have fun and who treats me well. Someone who I can have good conversation with and who makes me laugh."